Resources / Staff handoff design

Map a handoff that does not collect patient details

Show exactly where the assistant's responsibility ends and the practice's begins.

01

The operational decision

Show exactly where the assistant's responsibility ends and the practice's begins. A general-information handoff gives the caller a dependable next step. It does not quietly become patient intake, a callback commitment or evidence that someone on staff has accepted responsibility for a request.

02

Prepare the workflow

Draw separate steps for answering a public fact and supplying a direct contact route; remove any hidden message-taking step.

03

Example wording for approval

“I can give you the practice's public number. This information line has not submitted a patient request or arranged a staff callback.”

04

Worked example

Draw a fictional call as three boxes: visitor asks about hours, assistant answers from the public sheet, visitor asks about a personal visit. The final box should show a direct practice instruction, not a patient-message queue. Ask the reviewer what happens after the caller hangs up. If they expect a callback, the map or wording is misleading. Record the exact final action so everyone understands whether the workflow merely gave a contact route or performed a verified connection.

05

Handoff record

Record these task-specific fields: route name, final assistant action, staff channel, reviewer.

06

Acceptance check

Ask what will happen after the caller hangs up. The response should not imply that staff received information that was never delivered.

Front-desk time calculator ↗

Try Ava with your business’s public information ↗

Related guides

Your workflow, first

Let’s map your first week.

Bring the calls you want covered. We’ll agree the script, handoff and limits.

Start a pilot